Patricia Maria Tig vs Raluca Elena Joitoiu Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L W L L
Form
W W W L L W W W L LHead To Head: Tig 6 - 0 Joitoiu
They have played 13 sets in total, with Tig winning 12 and Joitoiu winning 1. The last match between Tig and Joitoiu was at the Arad, 04-08-2014, Quarterfinals, Clay with Patricia Maria Tig getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Patricia Maria Tig | 6 |
| Raluca Elena Joitoiu | 0 |
Arad(04-08-2014)
| Tig | Stats | Joitoiu |
|---|---|---|
| 61% (11-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 6 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 216 | Ranking | Ret. |
| 56 | Highest Rank | 487 |
| 30 | Age | 31 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 23 | Titles | 1 |
| 64% (399-223) | Career Total W/L | 57% (150-115) |
| $588,976 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 6 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Tien VS Giron PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-4 | |||||
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
| 6-2 6-3 | |||||
| 6-2 4-2 ret. | |||||
| 6-2 3-6 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 7-5 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 12 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 75 | Games Won | 43 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (6/6) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (6/6) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (6/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (6/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Patricia Maria Tig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Lola Radivojevic
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jesika Maleckova
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
29 of
44)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Amina Anshba
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
31 of
44)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
26 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
53%
(
37 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
76)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
11
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Ariana Geerlings
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
34 of
55)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Federica Urgesi
48%
(
22 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Julieta Pareja
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
77
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Emiliana Arango
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Katarzyna Kawa
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
73%
(
99 of
136)
1st Serve %
57%
(
84 of
147)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
18
47%
(
47 of
99)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
52 of
84)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
21 of
63)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
49%
(
67 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
74 of
147)
143
Total Points Won
140
|
7-5 6-7(2) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Miriana Tona
48%
(
35 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
41 of
85)
5
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
9
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Raluca Elena Joitoiu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 3-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R1 | 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 64% (399/223) | Win/Loss | 57% (150/115) |
| 63% (879/520) | Sets Win/Loss | 56% (330/255) |
| 56% (7023/5561) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (2743/2354) |
| 58% (99/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 70% (264/115) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (150/115) |
| 56% (35/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 13% (1/7) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0 |
| 609 | Aces Total | 0 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0 |
| 1799 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 489.95 | Average Opponent Rank | 518.37 |
| 60% (14199/23756) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 63% (8989/14199) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 46% (4361/9557) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (1515/3131) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (10984/23370) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 21% (6/22) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55% (16/13) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50% (52/52) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 61% (128/83) | Challenger W/L | 52% (14/13) |
| 79% (196/53) | Futures W/L | 57% (136/102) |
| 65% (393/604) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (150/257) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 59% (73/124) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (15/38) |
| 51% (85/168) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (30/57) |
| 88% (412/363) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (156/137) |
| 12% (412/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (156/18) |
| 17% (208/36) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (109/13) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
